Pages

Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Facebook reports $1.81 billion in revenue, 1.15 billion monthly active users


Facebook's Q2 2013 earnings
Facebook saw its revenue grow year-over-year in its Q1 earnings reported in May, and that trend has continued for its second quarter. The company has just announced that it's pulled in $1.81 billion in revenue for Q2, beating analysts' expectations, while net income stood at $333 million. Of course, much of that money comes from ads: Facebook says that revenue from advertising now represents 88 percent of its total revenue, and that mobile advertising accounted for about 41 percent of its total advertising revenue for the quarter. Mark Zuckerberg highlighted that last bit in a statement, saying that "the work we've done to make mobile the best Facebook experience is showing good results and provides us with a solid foundation for the future."
In other numbers, Facebook also reported that it has 1.15 billion monthly active users as of June 30th, while its daily active users stood at 669 million. Mobile users were again its biggest growth area, with 819 million users actively checking in on their mobile devices each month (up 51 percent compared to the same quarter in 2012), and 469 million active on a daily basis. We'll keep you posted on any additional developments that may come out of the company's earnings call in the next hour.
Update: Zuckerberg and co. didn't have much additional news to offer during the earning's call, although he did comment briefly on Facebook Home, which he described as a "seed we're planting," and something to look at over the long term.

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Facebook to ask users why they hide News Feed content


Facebook to ask users why they hide News Feed content
Hiding posts on Facebook has been a pretty simple affair, but the firm's gearing up to add a little more nuance. Instead of simply dismissing updates or sponsored stories, the social network will soon ask users why they decided to banish them from their News Feed. Details on how the feature will work are still MIA, but it could very well function like the site's advertisement hiding feature, which asks if ads are uninteresting, misleading or otherwise unpleasant. Naturally, giving the outfit the extra intel will allow it to serve up content and ads that better please your palate. Facebook's Product Manager for Ads Fidji Simo told ABC News that it'll start testing the tweaks soon, and users should start seeing them surface within the next three to four months. In the meantime, feel free to hide posts without answering to Zuck.

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Judge dismisses lawsuit over Instagram terms of service

(Credit: Instagram)
A federal judge has dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Instagram over controversial terms-of-service changes announced last year that many feared awarded ownership of users' photos to the popular photo-sharing service.
In a decision issued Friday, Judge William Alsup for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that Lucy Rodriguez could not sue Instagram for a number of procedural reasons, including the level of plaintiff's injury and state of residence. Alsup also denied plaintiff's request for leave to file a second amended complaint.
A Facebook representative declined to comment on the ruling.
The lawsuit, which was filed last December, accused the service of breach of contract and trying to "grab for customer property rights" after announcing revisions to its terms of service that many feared gave the service perpetual rights to sell users' photographs without payment or notification. After a user backlash, Instagram soon backpedaled on the changes and announced that the terms would revert to the version in place since the service launched in 2010.
Instagram had said that the new terms of service would go into effect January 19 and that users could not opt out but could delete their accounts before the deadline. The lawsuit took issue with that last point, claiming that customers could cancel but that in doing so would forfeit the right to their photos.
In a motion for dismissal in February, Instagram argued that Lucy Funes -- the original plaintiff in the case -- was not entitled to her claim because she could have deleted her account before the new terms were implemented and continued to use her account on January 19, when the changes in terms of service occurred. Lucy Rodriguez was substituted as the plaintiff in an amended filing in March.

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Facebook's Plan B for ads

The social network, currently under pressure to grow revenue, is now letting advertisers run a more familiar, albeit less holistic, ad type in the News Feed.

Facebook today announced that advertisers would be able to pitch members directly from the News Feed with less holistic messages that direct people outside of the social network's walled garden.
The launch, which Facebook is calling a "small alpha test," brings Facebook Exchange-targeted (FBX) ads, which are special ad units served to members based on their online browsing behavior, to the desktop version of News Feed for the first time.
"We wanted to give advertisers and agencies the opportunity to deliver highly relevant ads in News Feed, the most engaging place on the Web," the company wrote in a blog post. "We also believe that ads delivered through FBX will create more relevant ads for people."
The addition of the ad unit will not change the total number of ads people see in their News Feeds, the company said.
 
Previously, Facebook allowed advertisers to run FBX-delivered ads on the right-hand side on the desktop. This unit's format, called "Page post link ads" in Facebook speak, is more familiar to traditional display ad buyers than Facebook's own native ad unit, the Sponsored Story, because advertisers can tap their own user intent data for targeting purposes and direct people to outside landing pages, instead of Facebook Pages, for conversion-tracking.
The introduction of FBX-delivered ads to News Feed, albeit small to start, feels like Facebook's Plan B revenue-growth strategy. Sponsored Stories in News Feed, on both Web and mobile, sure sounded like the company's Plan A, especially the way Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg talked about the units, which offer Facebook Page owners increased exposure for their content, in post-earnings calls with investors and analysts.
In October, the company exclaimed that it was making $4 million a day from the in-stream, Sponsored Story placements by the end of the third quarter 2012.
But since the social network reported fourth-quarter earnings in late January, and stayed mum on revenue from News Feed ads, investors have been increasingly skeptical of the company's ability to grow revenue as it spends more. The stock has slid backward, down about $6 per share, or 20 percent, since it closed at $31.24 on Wednesday, January 30.
Investors haven't exactly rallied around today's reveal, but Facebook's shares are trading up by a few cents Tuesday. Perhaps there's something to this Plan B.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Facebook Is Creating Location-Sharing App

Facebook is developing a new app that keeps track of user location, and reports that information to friends when they're nearby, according to a report.
The app will be released mid-March, and will run even when it isn't open on users' phones, Bloomberg reports. For example, Facebook user Shirley may get a notification that says Bob is around the corner — even if neither of them happens to be using the app at that time.
Facebook is showing a keen interest in location-sharing. The company tested a “Find Friends Nearby” feature in its mobile app last June. Designed to facilitate meeting new people, users can quickly add the "John Smith" they meet at a party, without confusing him with the dozens of other John Smiths on Facebook.
Friendthem, another company, accused Facebook of stealing the idea, however; and shortly after, the social-network giant removed the feature from its mobile app.
Facebook's new app would be similar to location-sharing apps, Glancee and Highlight, and would run in the background of users' phones. Highlight, for instance, analyzes users' Facebook information to let them know when they're near friends, as well as when they're close to people with whom they share mutual friends or similar interests on the site.
Facebook acquired Glancee last May. The company's staff joined Facebook, and at the time indicated that it would be creating products for the site's community as a whole. Members of Glancee's engineering team are a part of the group creating the new app, Bloomberg reported.

Monday, August 13, 2012

Facebook Lets You Announce That You’re Expecting A Baby


detail


That Unbaby.me extension for scrubbing infants from your feed is about to get a lot more useful. Today Facebook launches a new Timeline event that lets you share that you’re expecting a baby, the due date, and whether it’s a boy or girl. Baby announcements appear in the Celebration sidebar beside birthdays on the day the kid is expected to pop out, along with showing up in the news feed. This new life event for babies is another sign that Facebook is maturing as its original user base of college kids in 2004 start hatching users who can join Facebook 13 years down the line.

You can add a baby life event by selecting the announcement from the Life Events drop down in the publisher on your Timeline.

Then on the due date it will appear in the Celebration sidebars of friends.

Today’s feature release follows the added ability to announce the date of your upcoming marriage on Facebook. And who knows, maybe the push is Zuck’s subtle way of saying him and new bride are expecting.

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Pinterest Drops Invites, Now Open to Everyone

pinterest-pinboard-600
Pinterest announced Wednesday that it began open registration, dropping its invite-only approach.
Users can now sign up for the social photo sharing website without waiting for an invitation, according to Pinterest’s official blog. Now, prospective pinners can register using their email addresses, or log in with their Facebook or Twitter accounts.
“We’re really excited to have the capacity to offer Pinterest to more people and if you’re a Pinner with friends who’ve been waiting on the sidelines, we hope you’ll let them know,” the blog said.
Prior to opening up, users had to click “Request an Invite” on Pinterest.com, and enter their email address.
The California-based company announced in late July the addition of new categories, including, “Quotes,” “Tattoos” and “Weddings,” which joined old standbys, “Food and Drink,” “Architecture” and “Home Decor.” Some category names were tweaked: “Pets” became “Animals,” and “Prints and Posters” is now “Illustrations and Posters.”
Pinterest also reported that it had improved old categories, so users see less miscategorized pins as they peruse boards
The site, a virtual pinboard where members organize and share photos of their favorite things, is one of the fastest-growing social networks online. Reports suggest that Pinterest is the third-largest social network in the U.S., behind only Facebook and Twitter. It is currently looking to expand into overseas markets, such as France, Germany and Japan.
In May, Pinterest raised $100 million in a round of funding that values the company at $1.5 billion.

Facebook's Director of Engineering explains how you're part of the dev team

Ever wondered why those crazy fools at Facebook think it's a good idea to meddle with the timeline, or how you chat? Well you can blame yourself. Probably. The social network's Director of Engineering, Andrew "Boz" Bosworth, reveals all in a recent blog post. By first explaining that the site evolves in a two-step process, "technology pushes people to move forward and then people move past technology and it has to catch up," we can start to understand why constant user testing of new, often multiple, solutions is required. Boz goes on to explain that by using select groups, or even nations, the efficacy new features can not only be quickly, and solidly determined, it can actually supplant the need for weeks of boardroom debate. He goes on to say that the odds are that everyone on Facebook has been part of a test at some point. Curious to know more about the process, or just feeling a little bit used? Head over to the source link for the full post / comment thread.

Oops! Facebook Admits One Of Its Algorithms Was Wrong; Restates A Revenue Breakdown

Facebook, in its first ever 10-Q filing with the SEC, admitted one of the algorithms it uses to calculate the average revenue per user in its largest market, the U.S. and Canada, was wrong.
The 10-Q restates the revenue breakdown and adjusts some of the numbers and columns in its reporting of revenues (most of which comes from ads) by geography.
Here's what Facebook said:
In June 2012, we discovered an error in the algorithm we used to estimate the geographic location of our users that affected our attribution of certain user locations for the first quarter of 2012. The first quarter of 2012 ARPU amount for the United States & Canada region below reflects an adjustment based on the reclassification to more correctly attribute users by geographic region.
Here are the two charts affected by the change (and apologies for the image quality). We've highlighted the restated sections in red. First, the Q2 2012 chart, on which revenue per user in North America is $2.90:
Facebook error
SEC
Now here's the old chart from Q1, where revenue per user was incorrectly listed as $2.86:
facebook error
SEC
In all, it's not a huge error and it doesn't affect Facebook's top or bottom lines. But it is interesting to know that Facebook's accounting isn't completely perfect.

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Facebook Introduces Mobile Ad Unit to Promote Apps


Just a few weeks after introducing its first mobile ad unit, Facebook has launched another one, this time designed to help mobile app developers market themselves.
Facebook is testing the new unit with a “limited set of beta partners” Vijaye Raji, a software engineer at the company, wrote on Facebook’s blog on Tuesday. The units drive users to new apps. If a user clicks on an ad and they don’t have the app already, they’ll be directed to the App Store or Google Play to download it.
The unit is automated; to buy an ad you merely have to fill out an online form and delineate which demo you’re trying to reach and what your budget is. Once you buy a unit, you can use Facebook’s analytics tools to assess its performance.
As Raji notes, there is clearly an audience for such a unit: In the past 30 days, Facebook has sent customers to the Apple App Store and Google Play 146 million times.
The introduction comes after Facebook introduced Sponsored Stories for the News Feed in June. A few independent studies have deemed the ads more effective than traditional desktop ads. Despite such success, investors appear skeptical of Facebook’s odds of maintaining its revenues via mobile ads.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Facebook launches virtual bingo game offering real cash prizes

Controls will prevent anyone aged under 18 from gambling on Bingo Friendzy.

Facebook's Bingo & Slots Friendzy
Facebook's Bingo & Slots Friendzy will not be regulated by the UK gambling commission, as its developer, Gamesys, is based in Gibraltar
Facebook has made its first move into online gambling in the UK, launching a virtual bingo machine that offers real cash prizes.
Britons aged 18 and over will be able to stake real money on the new Facebook game, dubbed Bingo Friendzy. The US social network plans to introduce virtual slot machines in the coming weeks.
Facebook insists that its controls will prevent anyone aged under 18 from gambling, but the move is likely to provoke some concern from parents whose children spend vast amounts of time on the site.
Bingo Friendzy has been developed by the gambling giant Gamesys, which runs several big-name jackpot sites including the Sun Bingo and Caesars Casino.
When a user signs up to Bingo Friendzy, they are asked to enter their personal details and confirm their date of birth. They are then asked to enter bank account details and make a deposit of between £10 and £500 to begin playing.
The game will not be regulated by the UK gambling commission because Gamesys is based in Gibraltar. The government has said it plans to make any company offering gambling services in the UK comply with the country's regulatory regime.
According to media regulator Ofcom, nearly two thirds of internet users in the UK are on Facebook. The average UK user spends six and a half hours a month on Facebook, which was the most popular internet destination behind Google search in March.
A spokeswoman for Facebook said: "Facebook is a place that allows people to connect and share. Real money gaming is a popular and well-regulated activity in the UK and we are allowing a partner to offer their games to adult users on the Facebook platform in a safe and controlled manner."
Facebook said it had no immediate plans to expand the venture to other markets, but the site could partner with other companies to launch new games in the UK.
Many countries outside the UK have more burdensome regulatory regimes for online gambling. In the US, for example, online gambling is largely prohibited in all but some states.
The venture into online gambling had long been expected for Facebook, which generates a growing amount of its worldwide revenues from gaming.
In the three months to 30 June, £123m ($192m) out of Facebook's £760m ($1.2bn) in revenues were generated from payments made in games such as Zynga's Farmville and Mafia Wars.
Licensed UK gambling is forecast to reach £10.0bn by 2012, according to the market intelligence firm H2 Gambling Capital. European interactive gambling was worth €8.3bn (£6.6bn) in 2009 and is expected to reach €12.6bn (£10bn) by 2012.

Amazon launches its own game studio, goes social with Living Classics on Facebook

Amazon launches its own game studio, goes social with Living Classics on Facebook
Amazon is committing itself to gaming much more seriously than providing a storefront: it just launched its own game development house. The simply titled Amazon Game Studios is starting out gently by producing a Facebook hidden object game, Living Classics, that lets the socially inclined dig around through scenes from well-known literature -- what else would you expect from the Kindle's creator? While the free, me-too game isn't going to give Microsoft or Sony any frights just yet, the company has the ambition of making "innovative, fun and well-crafted" titles. Amazon is actively recruiting more help for the studio as we write, so we'd expect more grandiose work before too long.

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Apple Wants To Buy Pinterest Rival, The Fancy

Apple is in talks to acquire The Fancy, a fast-growing social commerce site backed by cofounders of Twitter and Facebook.
The objective: to secure a role for Apple in the growing e-commerce market, putting the 400 million-plus users with credit cards on file with Apple's iTunes Store to work shopping—with Apple getting a cut of the action.
While The Fancy is far smaller than archrival Pinterest, which similarly lets users make lists of things they find interesting, the 20-person New York startup, led by cofounder and CEO Joe Einhorn, is much farther along in linking its users to transactions. The Fancy takes a 10 percent cut of purchases. Last we checked in, sales were exploding.
There is no signed deal and no guarantee one will happen. We do not know the price Apple has proposed to pay for The Fancy or how recently talks took place.
However, given what we've learned, it was apparently no coincidence that Einhorn and Apple CEO Tim Cook met at Allen & Co.'s Sun Valley conference earlier this year. The notoriously private Cook, who does not visibly participate in any well-known social media sites, started using The Fancy shortly afterwards.
The Fancy raised a $10 million round at a reported valuation of $100 million last fall, led by PPR, the French luxury conglomerate behind Gucci. It previously raised $6 million in 2010; $2.7 million of that round went to Einhorn and his cofounder, his brother Jack Einhorn, according to an SEC filing. Investment bank Allen & Co. was an early investor.
It would be reasonable to think its investors would expect a healthy return—call it 3 to 5 times what they paid. (Consider that nothing more than informed speculation, based on similar deals.)
Twitter cofounder Jack Dorsey and Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes are on the board, along with LeRoy Kim of Allen & Co. and James Pallotta, the owner of the Boston Celtics. Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, the co-founders of venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, are also investors.
Apple is not known for making big, splashy acquisitions. But a source familiar with Apple's acquisition strategy noted to us that The Fancy is at a stage where Apple typically buys companies.
For example, in recent years, it has bought several companies to bolster its online offerings, like Chomp, an app search engine; Lala.com, an online music service; and Placebase, a digital mapping company. It is in the process of trying to buy AuthenTec, a mobile security company.
Still, how can a two-year-old company with 20 employees possibly be worth that much to Apple?
Apple's history in e-commerce stretches back almost 15 years to November 10, 1997, when it opened its first online store. On April 28, 2003, it got into digital commerce with the iTunes Music Store. Those foundations in e-commerce let it roll out the iPhone's App Store. As Apple's sales of mobile devices exploded, so did its rolls of online customers registered with a credit card.
But as its tentative moves into general e-commerce have shown, sending those customers on a shopping spree isn't a simple matter. PassBook, a new online wallet introduced in the latest version of iOS, Apple's mobile operating system, lets users store discounts, gift cards, and airline tickets—but it doesn't let people spend money with stored credit cards.
The Fancy could change all that by giving Apple a clear route to converting people's interest in an object into a sale.
Apple could well build an e-commerce layer into its operating system and let application developers hook into it, giving them a way to make money besides advertising.
The Fancy has recently rolled out a system that gives users a cut of the sales their lists of objects generate.
Einhorn's company began life as a project called Thing Daemon, or ThingD, which aimed to be a universal database of things. In February, it adopted a model focused around e-commerce—and its business has taken off since.
The Fancy's offices are situated above an Apple Store in New York City. We don't think that has anything to do with anything, but it's funny, given the circumstances.
Einhorn declined to comment. Apple, Dorsey, Hughes, and PPR did not respond to requests for comment.

Saturday, August 4, 2012

Dear Yahoo, I Redesigned Your Website (And Took Out 512,240 Pixels Of Banner Ads)

Yahoo post - lede
Dear Yahoo!,
I’ve redesigned your website (five sites, actually) and I’d like to get your opinion.
Across five properties — Homepage, Screen, OMG, Flickr, Music — I’ve removed 4 square banner ads, 2 wide rectangles, 2 text ads, and an interruptive preroll. I’ve replaced those traditional ads with content-based ads that are entirely native to each site’s user experience — promoted videos, promoted playlists, promoted trends, promoted images, and promoted articles.
The kicker? I’m confident you could pull this off without having an impact on long term advertising revenue.
Y! Homepage: See the redesign
Y! Screen: See the redesign
Y! OMG: See the redesign
Flickr: See the redesign
Y! Music: See the redesign
Here’s what I removed (and no offense intended to the advertisers below):

* That’s 512,240 pixels of traditional display advertising, if anyone’s counting.
And here’s what I added:

Your Silicon Valley counterparts have entirely changed the ad game, starting from the ground up with design decisions built around the user experience and the product, not beholden to traditional “boxes and banners” economy. From Facebook’s Sponsored Stories, to Twitter’s Promoted Tweets, to YouTube’s Promoted Videos, the new platforms of record are changing the rules of the ad game, saying “no” to traditional ads – and are already driving $10B+ in “native ad” revenue.
In fact, Marissa Mayer was part of arguably the most successful native ad strategy of all time — Google’s promoted search ads.
So here’s my suggestion:
You have the opportunity at Yahoo to do for content-driven advertising what Google did for search-based advertising – make the ads native to the user experience.
Native search ads don’t try to distract you from what you came to Google to do; they actually help you find things (when done well). What if, in the same spirit, Yahoo encouraged advertisers to create and promote quality content (marked as “sponsored” of course) – videos, photos, articles, trends, music – and then allowed this content to compete on fair terms for readers’ attention?
Yahoo’s undeniable strength is content. From Sports to News to Entertainment, Yahoo has far exceeded any other Silicon Valley company’s efforts to build loyal audiences through original content. There could not be a better time for Yahoo to go native with content-driven advertising. Brands are investing unprecedented budgets in their own original content and publishing efforts, and are in deep need of new mediums to promote this branded content in native ways.
Yahoo, as the largest content company on the web, I say take a page from your frenemies, who are driving billions of dollars in native ad revenue.
Google = native ads in SEARCH.
Facebook = native ads in SOCIAL newsfeeds.
Twitter = native ads in the stream of real-time COMMUNICATION.
Yahoo = native advertising for CONTENT.
Your friendly, neighborhood native ad evangelist,
Dan Greenberg
CEO & Founder, Sharethrough

EA sues Zynga for copyright infringement

Electronic Arts is suing Zynga for copyright infringement, claiming the social gaming giant copied one of their games.
According to a complaint filed in U.S. District Court in California, EA alleges Zynga's new Facebook game The Ville is an "unmistakable copy" of The Sims Social.
"The similarities go well beyond any superficial resemblance," says Lucy Bradshaw, general manager of EA's Maxis label, the creators of The Sims Social. "Zynga's design choices, animations, visual arrangements and character motions and actions have been directly lifted from The Sims Social. The copying was so comprehensive that the two games are, to an uninitiated observer, largely indistinguishable."
In a statement responding to the lawsuit, Zynga general counsel Reggie Davis says the company plans to "defend our rights to the fullest extent possible."
"It's unfortunate that EA thought that this was an appropriate response to our game, and clearly demonstrates a lack of understanding of basic copyright principles," says Davis. "It's also ironic that EA brings this suit shortly after launching SimCity Social which bears an uncanny resemblance to Zynga's CityVille game.
Unveiled in June, The Ville allows players to create avatars and "build the home of their dreams," designing the interior and creating avatars that socialize with friends.
The Sims Social, launched last August on Facebook, lets players create their own Sim and start virtual lives on the social network.
The lawsuit underscores broader accusations that Zynga rips off other games. For example, in January, Tiny Tower creators NimbleBit called out Zynga for its title Dream Heights, Joystiq reported.
"Good luck with your game, we are looking forward to inspiring you with our future games," said NimbleBit.
EA's Bradshaw says the publisher is "taking a stand" against Zynga and the allegations of copying.
"By calling Zynga out on this illegal practice, we hope to have a secondary effect of protecting the rights of other creative studios who don't have the resources to protect themselves."

Friday, August 3, 2012

Outlook vs. Gmail: A Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Microsoft announced its Outlook webmail service this week, and it's a suprisingly robust new webmail client. But can it hold a torch to the current king of webmail, Gmail? To give you a better idea of how they stack up, here's a feature-by-feature comparison of Outlook vs. Gmail.
Feature-by-feature, the two services are remarkably similar. Here's a quick rundown:
Now for the more detailed breakdown.

Interface

Let's start with the first thing you're going to notice when you log into Outlook for the first time: the interface. Most of us are familiar with how Gmail looks and feels. Outlook's not entirely different, but it is a little simpler.

Outlook's Clean, Email-Centric Interface

Outlook is all about email. That's it. When you pop into Outlook, you're shown your email account and nothing else. You still get ads on the sidebar, but overall, it's a far less cluttered interface than Gmail (and it's way less cluttered than Hotmail) because Outlook isn't seeking to integrate with a bunch of other services. Ads are a little less creepy because they're not based on keywords in your inbox.

Gmail's Google-centric Interface

We all know Gmail's interface pretty well at this point. You get personalized ads on the main inbox page on the top, and a sidebar with ads inside your messages. You also have the chat window on the side and the Google bar on the top. It's not complicated by any means, but the Google bar is certainly a bit of a distraction.

Storage Space and Attachments

Email storage space isn't as big of a deal as it once was, but if you're sending a lot of large files back and forth, a hefty amount of storage is helpful.

Outlook Has Nearly Unlimited Storage and a 100MB Limit on Attachments

You get a "virtually unlimited" amount of storage in Outlook. We're not entirely sure what that means, but we do know that you can attach a file of up to 100MB to any email. If you link your email to Skydrive you can attach files up to 300MB.
For incoming attachments, Outlook retains the Hotmail-style Active View. YouTube videos open inside the email, a group of photos becomes a slideshow, and you can open any Office document directly in your browser.

Gmail Comes with 10GB of Storage and a 25MB Limit on Attachments

Gmail's limits on storage and attachment size are a lot smaller than Outlook's. Out of the gates, most Gmail users get 10GB of free storage, and attachments are limited to just 25MB in size.
Like Outlook, Gmail opens up YouTube videos directly inline with the email. Gmail also handles Office documents in a similar way, and opens them in browser with the option to edit in Google Docs. Images in Gmail are handled with a pretty typical list view and don't offer the slick sideshow that Outlook has.

Email Organization

For power-users, the most important part of a good webmail client is automatic email filing and organization. Gmail locked this down a while ago, but Outlook brings some new ideas to the table.

Outlook's Quick View Folders and Sweep Features

Outlook doesn't have the robust filtering and labeling system that Gmail does, but it has a few tricks up its sleeve. One is the Quick View folders. These folders are automatically filled with certain types of emails (flagged, photos, office, shopping, etc). For instance, from the sidebar you can instantly search through the last few messages with photo attachments, or messages about Groupon deals. The Sweep feature from Hotmail also carries over to Outlook. Sweeping works a lot like Gmail's labels where emails from certain people or places automatically get filed away in a folder of your choosing.

Gmail's Filters, Labels, and Priority Messages

Using Gmail's labels is an easy way to keep track which emails are important and where they are. Better still, it's simple to set up an automatic filter that combs your incoming mail and distributes messages directly into those labels. If you're still overwhelmed, the priority inbox is a lifesaver for designating which emails really matter.

Junk Mail Control

Everyone hates spam, and no webmail client is worth using if it doesn't have extensive spam filtering. Of course, it's not just spam, it's also the junk you've signed up for that matters (newsletters, mailing lists, coupons, and whatever else).

Outlook's Spam Control and Clever Batch Filtering

Only time will tell how good Outlook's spam control is, but one of Outlook's coolest features is how it handles newsletter-type messages. Outlook automatically labels these messages and adds an unsubscribe button to them—even if the email doesn't include one its own. It's super handy for filtering out those emails you don't mind getting, but don't want alerts constantly.

Gmail's Spam Control and Filter Settings

Gmail has a pretty great spam filter and chances are you won't have too much trouble with spam. However, it doesn't have the same out-of-the-box batch filtering system for that clutter email you get. Still, it's super easy to set up your own filter for things like newsletters. Just create a new filter with words like, "opt-out, unsubscribe, privacy policy, or manage your account" and all your newsletters and coupons will filter off into their own section.

POP/IMAP Support

If you use a third-party email client on your desktop or mobile device, POP or IMAP support is crucial for keeping everything in order. Support for either also matters when you want to look at email without an active internet connection.

Outlook Doesn't Support IMAP or POP, Instead uses ActiveSync

Here's one of Outlook's major bummers: it doesn't support IMAP or POP. This means using certain third party email services (like Apple's default desktop Mail app) won't work. You can still follow the guide for using Hotmail with POP and that should work with Outlook. Instead, Outlook uses ActiveSync. Subsequently, you can only use email apps that support ActiveSync.

Gmail Has Full Support for Both IMAP and POP

Gmail supports both IMAP and POP and you can switch your settings on the fly very simply. This means you can synchronize between multiple email clients very easily. It also means you can access your archived email even when you're offline.

Search Capabilities

If you receive hundreds of emails a day, then a solid search capability is key with any webmail client. You don't want to spend more than a few minutes hunting down a lost email.

Outlook Has Simple, but Effective Search

Outlook's search capability is pretty straight-forward. You can search by a simple keyword, or pop into the advanced search and narrow it down by email address, subject, folders, and dates. It's nothing too complex, but it works well enough.

Gmail's Comprehensive Advanced Search Strings

Gmail's search strings are pretty advanced. The nice part about Gmail's search is that you don't have to worry about a bunch of input boxes. Instead, you can just type commands like, label, list, or filename, directly into the search box. It's fast and effective for quickly searching through email.

Social Integration

Email is already inherently social, but if you're looking to connect your various social accounts into your email, it's increasingly easy to do.

Outlook's Social Integration with Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn

Outlook directly integrates with Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. When you log in with any of those services, you'll see status updates, link mailbox accounts, and more. From the sidebar you can retweet people on Twitter, comment on Facebook status updates, and more. If you don't like the feature, it's easy enough not to enable.

Gmail's Integrates with Google Plus

Since Gmail is owned by Google, its social integration starts and stops with Google Plus. The two are tied together in a lot ways, including contact listings, email filtering, and more. Provided your friends are using Google Plus, you can even instantly create email groups to send mass messages to.

Which One's Best for You?

Outlook is the newcomer, but it's a no-brainer for anyone currently using Hotmail. It's also a good go-to for anyone who wants a webmail client that only does email. Its simplicity is its greatest strength. That said, Google's integration with all of Google's services is nice, and it's advanced features and customization options are more appealing to the power user.

Zuckerberg Drops Out of Top 10 Tech Billionaires

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg had a tough week: His sister went to work for his top competitor, Google, his company’s stock price hit a new low and now he has dropped out of the top 10 tech billionaires list.
Zuckerberg’s fortune fell by $423 million on Thursday to $10.2 billion. That puts him $400 million behind James Goodnight, the co-founder of SAS Institute, the new number 10 on the $21 billion when the company went public in May. Zuckerberg owns 503.6 million shares of his company including 60 million options with an exercise price of $.06 a share. He also has $150 million in cash and other liquid assets, Bloomberg reports.
Facebook’s stock price on Thursday was down 47% from its $38 debut. On Friday morning, however, the stock was up about 2%.

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Google Acquires Wildfire, Will Now Sell Facebook And Twitter Marketing Services

Google has just bought social marketing software developer Wildfire, which lets brands serve marketing and ad campaigns on Facebook, Google+, Twitter, Pinterest, YouTube and LinkedIn. Wildfire has grown to 400 employees over the last four years and now serves 16,000 customers. [Update: We've now learned from a Wildfire investor that the company sold to Google for $350 million, higher than the $250 million price we and others previously reported.]
The acquisition will allow Google to provide advanced software and services to brands who want to run contests, sweepstakes, branded games and more on Google+. Wildfire will still operate as a marketing tool for brands on Google’s competing platforms, including Facebook, putting the search giant in a curious position where it earns money on the success of its rivals.
Google bid on buying Buddy Media but lost the deal to Salesforce. With Oracle buying other social marketing leaders Vitrue and Involver, Wildfire was the last top-tier startup in the space. Today’s deal leaves this moment, another popular marketing platform, as a possible buy for old-world enterprise juggernauts like IBM or SAP.
Now it’s successfully bought one of Facebook’s biggest marketing partners. [Update: Dave McClure of 500 Startups, an early Wildfire investor, this morning commented here that the $250 million price tag we reported was "substantially lower than actual". Now we've learned that another investor has said Google bought Wildfire for $350 million -- nearly a 25X multiple on the $14.1 million it had raised through its Series B.]
But Google hasn’t directly entered the social ad space yet. Wildfire only offers ad buying through a partnership with startup Adaptly. [Update: That's why I've just published "Wildfire Only Sells Ads Through Its Partner Adaptly, So Will Google Buy Them Too?"]

Wildfire claims there will be no disruption or immediate changes to the service it offers, which includes ad buying (via Adaptly), feed publishing, Page management, social app and contest development, analytics, social monitoring:
“We remain focused on helping brands run and measure their social engagement and ad campaigns across the entire web and across all social services — Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google+, Pinterest, LinkedIn and more — and to deliver rich and satisfying experiences for their consumers. To this end, Wildfire will operate as usual, and there will be no changes to our service and support for our customers.
That puts Google in an odd spot, where it will benefit if social networks such as Facebook and Twitter rise in popularity amongst brands. This hedges it against failure of Google+ as play to gain ad-targetable social data, but could heat up the on-going API battles between the top social platforms.
What if Facebook denied Wildfire API access? That could sting Google but it’s unlikely as it would send a shockwave through Facebook’s developer ecosystem. Facebook may have to grit its teeth and watch Google cash in on brands trying to infiltrate the news feed and its mobile apps. Though since it decides who gets early access to new features that can attract clients, Facebook could subtlety hurt Wildfire by favoring its competitors.
Wildfire will help handle owned marketing, such as handling Pages and other properties brands control, to complement Google’s DoubleClick AdX/Admeld paid marketing service for buying ads on search and other websites. The acquisition shows that Google understands that ads can’t do it all. Tons of brand spend is going towards managing their presences on social networks, and now it will get a slice of that pie too.

For more on Google’s acquisition of Wildfire, read: “Wildfire Only Sells Ads Through Its Partner Adaptly, So Will Google Buy Them Too?“
I’ll also be discussing the acquisition on stage this Friday with Facebook’s VP of ads engineering Greg Badros at TechCrunch’s Facebook Ecosystem CrunchUp in the Bay Area. There’s still a few last tickets available.

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Sony hoping to work Android 4.1 into Xperia line

Sony has not completely ruled out an Android 4.1 Jelly Bean update for its 2011 Xperia line, despite what the company may have told you just days ago.
A post on the company's blog today advises that it is "actively investigating" software updates for all of its devices and that 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich deployments still are on track.
Rumors spread quickly last week that Xperia models from 2011 wouldn't see an Android 4.1 update. A member of the Sony UK team hosted a Q&A with Facebook followers where he advised that the Xperia Arc S and a few other handsets would not be getting Jelly Bean. Fast-forward a few days and we've since learned that the rep "gave information out in error."
It's not immediately clear whether the agent was actually right or he let the news slip out in a very unofficial capacity. At this point, I'd be surprised if the left hand is talking to the right hand over at Sony. I suspect that some of the models released in the second half of 2011 will see 4.1, but those released early in the year may get snubbed. Sony was somewhat hesitant to push its Android smartphones stateside until just recently so I cannot imagine too many U.S. users worried about Jelly Bean.
Sony advises that users and interested parties keep an eye on its product blog where it will continue to outline details for Android 4.0 updates and beyond.

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Irish watchdog aborts talks with Europe vs. Facebook, via text

Ireland's Office of the Data Protection Commissioner says it will determine, by October, whether Facebook will face legal action under European privacy laws.

The Austrian group Europe versus Facebook, which has been a thorn in the social-networking giant's European side ever since it brought various privacy issues to light and spurred an investigation by Ireland Data Protection Commissioner Billy Hawkes, just got a rather unpleasant text message. The Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC) has made it quite clear it does not have the time to talk to the watchdog group, even though the duo has been working together for months with the goal of getting Facebook to care about privacy.
You might think all of this isn't a big deal, but it's has has potential impacts for all Facebook users. Just because you don't live in Ireland, or Europe, doesn't mean you're not affected. You already have been, and you will once again be depending on what happens in the next few months.
Europe versus Facebook has been sending letters back and forth with the ODPC in order to get more information about why the laws against Facebook are not being enforced. When the group didn't get an answer, it tried calling the office. The discussion with the secretary led nowhere, and instead of a call back, the response came in the form of a text message on Friday:
Max, I know you have contacted the office. Neither the commissioner nor myself are available to speak to you. Regards Gary
Max Schrems is the founder of Europe versus Facebook. Gary Davis is the deputy commissioner. Below is a video showing Schrem's reaction to Davis' SMS:
"In a letter we finally wanted to clarify problems we experienced in the proceeding before the ODPC," Schrems said in a statement. "There is no written procedural law for the ODPC, which resulted in the ODPC 'inventing' its own rules. These 'inventions' massively weaken our position in the proceeding against Facebook: For about a year we have been denied access to all files, evidence and even the legal counterarguments by Facebook. A fair proceeding against Facebook is practically impossible under these conditions."
"At the same time this makes it impossible to asses if the ODPC has made a proper decision," Schrems continued. "The same is true for 'deals' between the ODPC and Facebook. We cannot accept this situation before an authority within the EU. Unfortunately this very likely means that there are no more chances for a fair proceeding for us in Ireland. We can currently not believe that the responsible officer can decide in an unbiased way after we have made our criticism public. It is unclear how this proceeding will go on. We will fly to Ireland next week and talk to lawyers... This means the situation will stay interesting!"
Schrems outlined the following problems his group faces while trying to communicate with the legal teams for ODPC and Facebook:
  • Facebook does not give us their counterarguments, since they said they were afraid that their arguments might be used against them at court.
  • The ODPC does not give us their legal counterarguments either. Some selected arguments will be included in the "draft decision." What will be included is based on the sole discretion of the ODPC. Facebook received our arguments from the very beginning.
  • Until now, the "raw data" we received from Facebook after we exercised our right to access was the most important piece of evidence.
  • Facebook stopped delivering such data after we published our findings, despite an obligation under the Irish and EU law to disclose such data within 40 days.
  • The ODPC is referring us to a "Download Tool" which holds some, but by far not all data, after waiting for this tool for about a year.
  • The tool does not provide the raw data (the way it is stored on the servers), but processed data which is displayed as a normal webpage. Only Facebook can decide what information is available and in what format. External control is impossible.
  • The ODPC does not see any reason enforce this right to access, despite more than 1,000 users having made complaints and 100 complaining to the EU.
  • The entire procedure is run as a "secret trail". We are generally denied to access any of the files or evidence in our own procedure.
  • We do not know about the different "deals" between the ODPC and Facebook.
  • We are not treated as a party of a legal proceeding, but like the general public.
It's understandable for Schrems to be "stunned" at the message he received. After all, the Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) is planning to publish its next Facebook privacy review in early October, when it will determine if the social networking giant will face legal action under European privacy laws. If Schrems can't properly argue his side of the case, Facebook will be able to get its way without much conflict.
For its part, the ODPC says its text message was not meant to add insult to injury:
"Europe-v-facebook performed a useful public service in highlighting the specific issues raised in its complaints," the Irish watch dog said in a statement. "We informed the organization last week that we had nothing to add to the answers we had already provided both orally and in writing and that therefore senior staff members were not available to discuss such procedural matters any further."
That doesn't cut it for Schrems. "Bad service? According to different media, the ODPC feels sorry that we did not like the "service' we experienced," he said in a statement. "The ODPC is missing the point that we are asking to basic procedural rights and not 'better service.' The ODPC does not react to the criticism that we have outlined. There is not a single word on a fair proceeding. It seems like the ODPC hopes to overcome this situation by ignoring it. On top of that the ODPC has said that it go on with the proceeding just like before. Engaged extensively? The ODPC is even claiming that it has engaged continuously and extensively with europe-v-facebook.org. This is simply wrong: Since we have filed our complaints we were in fact locked out of our own proceeding. We can only wonder about the statements by the ODPC. At the same time we are still inviting the ODPC to start engaging 'extensively' from now on. It just seems that the chances for this are not too good..."

Last month, Europe versus Facebook forced Facebook to put its new privacy policy (or rather Data Use Policy) up for a vote, by taking advantage of a loophole in the social network's own rules. The plan didn't get very far.
Facebook requires 30 percent of all users to vote for a change to be binding. Unfortunately, only 0.038 percent participated in the poll, meaning that even though most of the votes were against the change, Facebook did not have to do anything. That's despite the fact that the Data Use Policy affects everyone, not just those in Europe.
Facebook has more than 955 million monthly active users, but its U.S. headquarters is not responsible for the majority of them. Facebook's international headquarters is in Dublin, meaning all users outside of the U.S. and Canada are subject to Irish and European data protection laws. Facebook chose Dublin for the tax incentives: businesses are charged approximately 2 percent tax in Dublin compared to 35 percent tax in the U.S.
Europe versus Facebook originally made 22 formal complaints regarding the social network's practices. The group even managed to accidentally get Reddit involved, whose users overwhelmed Facebook with data requests back in September 2011. Eventually, the ODPC took notice.
This past December, the DPC completed his three-month privacy audit of Facebook's activities. Facebook promised to make a slew of changes, and agreed to a more formal follow-up review in July 2012.
The second audit will test whether Facebook has improved its privacy stance as promised, and will ensure the company is complying with European laws. "It's still all systems go, on getting this work with Facebook to an end, and from our perspective producing an output which ensures that Facebook is compliant with European data protection," Davis told Reuters. As you know, it's already the end of July, so it looks like October 2012 is the next timeframe deadline